(C) 2012 Massimo Meregalli. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.
The application of the name Curculio echii Brahm, 1790 is discussed. Based on the description it is evident that it should be applied to a German species of the genus Rhabdorrhynchus, and that it has priority over the name currently applied to the species, Rhabdorrhynchus seriegranosus Chevrolat, 1873. The new combination Rhab-dorrhynchus echii (Brahm, 1790) is proposed. As there is a lack of any type material of Curculio echii a neotype is designated. Based on the study of the type specimen, Rhabdorrhynchus seriegranosus is restored as a valid species.
Neotype, new combination, nomenclature, European fauna, Palaearctic weevils
In the course of the preparation of the Catalogue of the Palaearctic Coleoptera: Lixinae: Cleonini several nomenclatural questions had to be resolved, and several previously undetected cases of priority came to light. Some of these concerned taxa seldom, if ever, cited in the literature. However, in some cases the “lost” names were applied to taxa more broadly known.
Brahm (1790) published an “Insect Calendar”, in which he mentioned, month by month, the species that he had seen or collected in the surroundings of Mainz (Germany). In most cases he referred them to previously named taxa, but some of the species were described as new. One of these is Curculio echii Brahm, 1790: 175. The description is rather accurate, cites the plant where Brahm collected one specimen (Echium vulgare L.) and emphasizes its key traits. This description allows identification of Curculio echii as belonging to the genus Rhabdorrhynchus Motschulsky, 1860. Only one species of the genus is known to occur in Germany, thus the application of the name is undisputed. The comb. n. Rhabdorrhynchus echii (Brahm, 1790) is here proposed, based on Curculio echii Brahm, 1790: 175.
However, even though this was the first name to have been assigned to this species, it was born under an unlucky star, and it soon became forgotten. The name Curculio echii, published as it was in a book that did not have any influence in nomenclature, was not used in subsequent works. It was occasionally cited in nomenclatural checklists, both older ones (Sherborn 1902) and recent on-line name indexes (i.e., ION 2012), but it was never positively applied to any taxon and no transfer to other genera was ever proposed.
In 1795 Herbst described Curculio varius Herbst, 1795, from Europe. Regardless to the fact that this name is a junior homonym of Curculio varius Fabricius, 1775, and several other senior homonyms, it was continuously applied to the central European species, firstly (Schoenherr 1826) as Pachycerus varius, and subsequently, after publication of Chevrolat (1873), as Rhabdorrhynchus varius. Chevrolat (1873) also described Rhabdorrhynchus seriegranosus Chevrolat, 1873, from Algeria. This name was placed under synonymy of Rhabdorrhynchus varius by Faust (1904).
Throughout the 20th century the species, in Faust’s concept, was named Rhab-dorrhynchus varius (Csiki 1934, as in all other papers which cited the species, including Ter-Minasyan 1988). It ranges in central-southern Europe, northern Africa and western Asia. Eventually, Alonso-Zarazaga and Lyal (1999) discovered the homonymy of Curculio varius Herbst, 1795 and its only synonym, Rhabdorrhynchus seriegranosus Chevrolat, 1873, became the valid name and it was applied to specimens from Europe, Northern Africa and Western Asia.
However, Rhabdorrhynchus echii is the first available name to be applied to the taxon and must be used as the correct name for this species. Rhabdorrhynchus seriegranosus was seldom used since 1999 and article 23.9.1.2 ICZN cannot be applied.
It should be added that the taxonomy of the genus was never thoroughly revised, and there is still uncertainty regarding the validity of some species and their range. The type specimen of Rhabdorrhynchus seriegranosus, recently examined by one of the authors (M.M.), differs quite significantly from the European taxon (Figs 1-4), and attribution of specimens from the southern Mediterranean coasts to the central European species, as originally proposed by Faust (1904) and never subsequently discussed, seems questionable. The synonymy Rhabdorrhynchus echii (Brahm, 1790) = Rhabdorrhynchus seriegranosus Chevrolat, 1873 is here rejected and Rhabdorrhynchus seriegranosus is restored as a valid species.
This act also allows maintainance as valid the first epithet attributed to the Algerian Rhabdorrhynchus. Two more species were in fact subsequently described from Algeria, namely, Rhabdorrhynchus curvirostris Solari, 1950 and Rhabdorrhynchus longicollis Solari, 1950, both based on a single specimen, never recollected anywhere else and thus apparently endemic to the country – which is at least unlikely. The status of these species, and their relations with Rhabdorrhynchus seriegranosus and the other north-african taxa of the genus, were never discussed after their description.
It is evident that a typification of Curculio echii Brahm is required. Nikolaus Joseph Brahm (1751–1821) was a German zoologist, but there is no information about the fate of his collection, which was never cited in the literature. Horn et al. (1990) do not even report the name. Thus we consider the type specimen of Curculio echii to be lost.
We hereby designate a neotype of Curculio echii Brahm, using a specimen from southern Germany. This act is done with the intent to fix once and for all the meaning of the name and to stabilize nomenclature (under Art. 75.3 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature), with particular regard to the central European taxon.
A specimen conserved at the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart, Germany, collected in Baden-Württenberg, southern Germany – thus not far from Mainz – is appropriate to be used as the neotype of Rhabdorrhynchus echii. An appropriate description for the central-European populations was given by Dieckmann (1983), under Rhabdorrhynchus varius Herbst.
Curculio echii Brahm 1790. NEOTYPE (here designated): A male specimen so labeled: 1. Germany, Ba- / den–Württ. / Grißheim / 6.Aug.1994 / leg. Kasper // Rheinaue // Rhabdorhyn- / chus varius / Herbst / det. Kasper // Curculio echii Brahm 1790 / NEOTYPUS / 2012 Meregalli & Alonso-Z. des. [red]
The range of the species is here considered to include only the forms morphologically referable to Rhabdorrhynchus echii, mainly present in Central and central-eastern Europe. The populations from southern Europe, northern Africa and Western Asia are referred to Rhabdorrhynchus seriegranosus.
1 Rhabdorrhynchus echii (Brahm, 1790). Neotype, dorsal view 2 Rhabdorrhynchus seriegranosus Chevrolat, 1873. Type specimen, dorsal view. Conserved at the Stockholm Museum of Natural History, Chevrolat colletion.
1 Rhabdorrhynchus echii (Brahm, 1790). Neotype, dorsal view 2 Rhabdorrhynchus seriegranosus Chevrolat, 1873. Type specimen, dorsal view. Conserved at the Stockholm Museum of Natural History, Chevrolat colletion.
3 Rhabdorrhynchus echii (Brahm, 1790). Neotype, lateral view 4 Rhabdorrhynchus seriegranosus Chevrolat, 1873. Type specimen. Same specimen as Fig. 2.
3 Rhabdorrhynchus echii (Brahm, 1790). Neotype, lateral view 4 Rhabdorrhynchus seriegranosus Chevrolat, 1873. Type specimen. Same specimen as Fig. 2.
We wish to thank our friend Wolfgang Schawaller (Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart) for the loan of the specimen of Rhabdorrhynchus used as the neotype, and Mike Morris (The Natural History Museum, London) for revising the English language.